Russia has been left out among the world leaders gathered at the United Nations



Washington: America and its allies got a new casting opportunity Vladimir Putin With the gathering of world leaders in New York this week as an isolated pariah on the global stage, even as the United Nations failed to stop or even stop Russia’s war in Ukraine Is.
The big question is whether the condemnation matters, and whether some nations reluctant to choose sides will turn words into action.
In speech after speech, leaders appearing before the General Assembly condemned Russia’s invasion of its neighbour. He also sought to inject new impetus into efforts to combat the global food crisis caused by the war, including the US announcement of an additional $2.9 billion in food aid. United Nations security Council A meeting was scheduled for Thursday in Ukraine, where Russia’s actions were certain to be condemned, despite a veto to prevent real action.
“This war is about ending Ukraine’s right to exist as a state, plain and simple,” President Joe Biden told the General Assembly in a speech on Wednesday. “If nations can pursue their imperial ambitions without consequence, we risk everything for this institution—everything.”
While the reaction from Biden and other Western leaders was no surprise, even some leaders who were wary of taking sides at first were a little more outspoken in calling on Putin. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has sought to present himself as a mediator, but has also urged an interview with PBS NewsHour. putin To return the territory occupied by Ukraine.
“The lands that were attacked will be returned to Ukraine,” Erdogan said. Nevertheless, the Turkish leader refrained from blaming Putin directly, instead calling for a negotiated solution.
The war in Ukraine has not only dominated the formal speeches that characterize this busy week of global diplomacy. The conflict is also shaping up to many bilateral conversations between leaders in conference rooms, and creating quiet conversations in the hallways of the city’s packed luxury hotels.
However, so far, Putin seemed to be fearless of all the criticism.
As he has often done in the past, President Putin skipped the big week of the General Assembly, sending Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in his place, and turned his nose at all calls for peace by intensifying the war. With diplomatic events in full swing, he announced a partial mobilization of more than 300,000 troops and his intention to hold a plebiscite and the territory occupied by his troops.
John Herbst, the former US ambassador to Ukraine, said in an interview on Bloomberg, “The United Nations was created to help avoid situations like this, but as long as Russia has a veto in the Security Council and can wage an aggressive war.” The United Nations cannot serve that purpose.” Television’s “Balance of Power with David Westin.”
There may be more to come from countries with more influence on Putin. He faced criticism – albeit mild – from the Indian Prime Minister. Narendra Modi In recent weeks, even though the Indian leader has not participated in US-led efforts to impose sanctions on Russia over the war.
Modi will not attend the event in New York this week, but his foreign minister may add some pressure to India’s speech on September 25.
At the same time, there was a lot of evidence that, despite all the condemnation from the West, other countries still wanted to trade with Russia. Lavrov had a full slate of meetings – although his staff did not say with whom.
Senegal’s Mackie Sall urged a “negotiable solution” to the crisis and urged leaders not to divide less powerful countries on ideological lines.
“Africa has suffered greatly from the burden of history,” he said. “It doesn’t want to be the site of a new Cold War.”
Although some countries in Southeast Asia and Africa have been reluctant to engage in sanctions against Moscow, much attention has also been paid this week to the global food crisis, which has worsened dramatically as a result of Russia’s war.
“Zambia joins other governments in expressing particular concern about the ongoing war in Ukraine,” President Hakende Hichilema told the UN forum on Wednesday afternoon. “We also use this opportunity to emphasize the far-reaching negative consequences of this war, particularly on food prices around the world.”
“A war of a few months can wipe out decades of progress,” he said.
With Russia vetoed as one of the five permanent members of the Security Council, the United Nations would have to rely on such a show of unity.
Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida criticized the “failure” from the forum on Tuesday, saying “we must face the fact that the credibility of the United Nations is at risk because of Russia’s aggression against Ukraine.” “In keeping with Tokyo’s long-standing desire for an overhaul of the Security Council – where it is not among the permanent members – and of the United Nations.” The United Nations does not exist solely for the benefit of the great powers. The United Nations exists for the entire international community.”
The cri de coeur most passionate about Putin’s invasion came from UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, who called for attention to deep divisions in his speech, kicking off the week of meetings and speeches.
Guterres said, ‘We cannot proceed like this. “We have a duty to act. And yet we are caught in a vast global dysfunction.”


Source link


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here